On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:40:57AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > .../devicetree/bindings/drm/i2c/tda998x.txt | 13 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_codec.c | 247 +++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c | 74 ++++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.h | 32 +++ > include/drm/i2c/tda998x.h | 1 + I'd expect to see the ASoC parts of this appear under sound/soc (even if just a library that the DRM driver links against rather than as a MFD). This should help avoid cross tree issues and surprises when people do API changes. > + - audio-ports: one or two values corresponding to entries in > + the audio-port-names property. What are these values? > + - audio-port-names: must contain "i2s", "spdif" entries > + matching entries in the audio-ports property. So it's mandatory that both I2S and S/PDIF be specified? The code looks broadly sensible in so far as it
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
