Hi Rob, On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:20:09 -0400 Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Boris BREZILLON > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:06:06 +0200 > > Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> This patch series reworks the flip-work framework to make it safe when > >> calling drm_flip_work_queue from atomic contexts. > >> > >> The 2nd patch of this series is optional, as it only reworks > >> drm_flip_work_init prototype to remove unneeded size argument and > >> return code (this function cannot fail anymore). > > > > > > Atmel HLCDC driver now depends on this series and I'd like to get as > > much thing as possible for HLCDC support in 3.18 (if the driver can't > > make it for 3.18, at least the dependencies could). > > > > David, Rob (and other DRM/KMS developers) do you have any concern you > > would like addressed in this patch series ? > > it already has my r-b :-) Yes, I know, I was just checking that you were still okay with this series ;-). -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
