On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:49:57PM +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > If we already have a timestamp for the current vblank counter, don't > update it with a new timestmap. Small errors can creep in between two > timestamp queries for the same vblank count, which could be confusing to > userspace when it queries the timestamp for the same vblank sequence > number twice. > > This problem gets exposed when the vblank disable timer is not used > (or is set to expire quickly) and thus we can get multiple vblank > disable<->enable transition during the same frame which would all > attempt to update the timestamp with the latest estimate. > > Testcase: igt/kms_flip/flip-vs-expired-vblank > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c > index af33df1..0523f5b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c > @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc) > DRM_DEBUG("enabling vblank interrupts on crtc %d, missed %d\n", > crtc, diff); > > + if (diff == 0) > + return; > + > /* Reinitialize corresponding vblank timestamp if high-precision query > * available. Skip this step if query unsupported or failed. Will > * reinitialize delayed at next vblank interrupt in that case. > -- > 1.8.5.5 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel