Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/irq: Implement a generic vblank_wait function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31.07.2014 16:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I think it would be better to refactor drm_wait_vblank() than to
>> reinvent it.
> 
> That's the ioctl implementation which spends most of its time decoding
> ioctl structures. If we take that out then there's about half a line
> which would be shared (since a lot of the stuff in there is ums gunk
> that we don't want to carry over to a kms-only internal interface). So
> imo that doesn't make sense.

I'm referring to the core logic of waiting for a number of vblank
periods or until the vblank period with a given sequence number, dealing
with wraparound etc. The issues you guys were discussing for a new
function were ironed out there long ago.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer            |                  http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast          |                Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux