Hey Inki, On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 08:50 +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > Hey Inki, > > On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 12:02 +0900, Inki Dae wrote: > > On 2014년 07월 19일 05:36, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > > The exynos DRM module currently is not automatically loaded when build as a > > > module. This is due to the simple fact that it doesn't have any > > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE entries whatsoever... Most of these were removed previously > > > as it wasn't possible at the time to have multiple calls to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE > > > in one module, however commit 21bdd17b21b45ea solved that. > > > > > > The first two patches revert the previous removals of MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE > > > calls, while the last one adds calls for the remaining OF match tables without a > > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE call. > > > Exynos drm follows single-driver model. So each usb driver of Exynos drm > > wouldn't need its own MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE. > > Strictly speaking you're right, for module autoloading to work the > module just needs to have one that matches. So in principle all other > entries are redundant. > > However for exynos drm there does not seem to be one main device which > is guaranteed to always be present which can be used to key the module > autoloading of. So you still need seperate MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE entries > for all the various subdrivers to ensure autoloading actually happens, > especially since the various subdrivers can be seperately enabled > at build time. Been about a week since this last mail. If you have any suggestions on a better approach or on how to move this forward, i'd be very grateful to hear as i think i've addressed your original comment on the set in the previous reply? -- Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Collabora Ltd.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
