On 18.07.2014 01:29, Alex Deucher wrote:
> @@ -55,10 +55,13 @@ int radeon_gem_object_create(struct radeon_device *rdev, int size,
> alignment = PAGE_SIZE;
> }
>
> - /* maximun bo size is the minimun btw visible vram and gtt size */
> - max_size = min(rdev->mc.visible_vram_size, rdev->mc.gtt_size);
> + /* Maximum bo size is the gtt size since we use the gtt to handle
> + * vram to system pool migrations. We could probably remove this
> + * check altogether with a little additional work.
> + */
This comment needs updating: it's not the full GTT size anymore, and how
could we remove this check?
> @@ -331,6 +335,12 @@ int radeon_bo_unpin(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++)
> bo->placements[i] &= ~TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
> r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, false, false);
> + if (likely(r == 0)) {
> + if (bo->tbo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM)
> + bo->rdev->vram_pin_size -= radeon_bo_size(bo);
> + else
> + bo->rdev->gart_pin_size -= radeon_bo_size(bo);
> + }
> if (unlikely(r != 0))
> dev_err(bo->rdev->dev, "%p validate failed for unpin\n", bo);
Might be better to convert the failure case to use else, no big deal though.
Other than that, the patches look good to me as well.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
