On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 23:45:54 -0400
Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Boris BREZILLON
> <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The Atmel HLCDC (HLCD Controller) IP available on some Atmel SoCs (i.e.
> > at91sam9n12, at91sam9x5 family or sama5d3 family) provides a display
> > controller device.
> >
> > This display controller supports at least one primary plane and might
> > provide several overlays and an hardware cursor depending on the IP
> > version.
> >
> > At the moment, this driver only implements an RGB connector to interface
> > with LCD panels, but support for other kind of external devices (like DRM
> > bridges) might be added later.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 2 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/Kconfig | 11 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/Makefile | 7 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c | 469 +++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.c | 474 +++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h | 210 +++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_layer.c | 706 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_layer.h | 422 ++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_panel.c | 351 ++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c | 729 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 11 files changed, 3382 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/Kconfig
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_layer.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_layer.h
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_panel.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> > index d1cc2f6..df6f0c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> > @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ source "drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/Kconfig"
> >
[...]
> > +/**
> > + * Atmel HLCDC Layer GEM flip garbage collector structure
> > + *
> > + * This structure is used to schedule GEM object release when we are in
> > + * interrupt context (within atmel_hlcdc_layer_irq function).
> > + *
> > + *@list: GEM flip objects to release
> > + *@list_lock: lock to access the GEM flip list
> > + *@work: work queue scheduled when there are GEM flip to collect
> > + *@finished: action to execute the GEM flip and all attached objects have been
> > + * released
> > + *@finished_data: data passed to the finished callback
> > + *@finished_lock: lock to access finished related fields
> > + */
> > +struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_gem_flip_gc {
> > + struct list_head list;
> > + spinlock_t list_lock;
> > + struct work_struct work;
> > +};
>
>
> Please have a look at drm_flip_work.. I think that should simplify
> post-flip cleanup for you..
>
Now I remember why I didn't make use of drm_flip_work helpers:
I have to specify a fifo size when initializing the
drm_flip_work structure (drm_flip_work_init) and I don't know exactly
what I should choose here.
You might have noticed that I'm queuing the unref work to be done within
the irq handler (which means I'm in irq context), and, AFAIU,
drm_flip_work_queue will execute the function if the FIFO is full
(AFAIK calling drm_framebuffer_unreference in irq context is not safe).
This leaves the following solutions if I ever want to use drm_flip_work:
- use a threaded irq. Meaning the next frame (or the pending plane
update) might take a bit longer to be displayed.
- increase the fifo size, so that it's never entirely filled (relying
on the assumption that the flip work queue will be executed at least
as much as the plane update requests)
- rely on the assumption that work_queue will be executed at least
once per fb flip. This is true for the primary plane because we're
using page_flip and only one page_flip can take place at a given
time, but AFAIK this is not true for plane updates.
My approach is to use a simple list instead of a kfifo to queue fb
flip unref work, this way I don't have to bother about whether the fifo
is full or not.
ITOH, this means I might keep fb references longer than I would when
using drm_flip_work, and potentially get out of resources if plane
updates occurs more often than my unref work queue is called.
Please, let me know what's the preferred solution here.
Best Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
