2014-07-08 22:37 GMT+09:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:25:19AM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> Anyway as this is upstream i guess you can keep it. This is just an horrible >> API that allow to circumvant any limit set by memcg for page locking and all. >> But anyway GPU driver never played in the same ballpark as other driver. > > I agree that exynos userptr as-is should be removed since as opposed to > the i915 implementation it doesn't play nice with the core mm Can you give me more details why you think so? > and allos > unpriviledged userspace to exceed all mlock limits. we can make the userptr ioctl to have master permission for the meantime. Thanks, Inki Dae > > I've taken considerable amounts of internal heat for rejecting i915 > userptr until the mmu notifier stuff was implemented and so really want > exynos to fix this up asap. > > Dave? > > Thanks, Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
