On 8 July 2014 20:09, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:44:27PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:30:52AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > >> Android can expose fences to userspace. It's possible to make the new fence >> > > >> mechanism expose the same fences to userspace by changing sync_fence_create >> > > >> to take a struct fence instead of a struct sync_pt. No other change is needed, >> > > >> because only the fence parts of struct sync_pt are used. But because the >> > > >> userspace fences are a separate problem and I haven't really looked at it yet >> > > >> I feel it should stay in staging, for now. >> > > > >> > > > Ok, that's reasonable. >> > > > >> > > > At first glance, this all looks "sane" to me, any objection from anyone >> > > > if I merge this through my driver-core tree for 3.17? >> > > >> > > Ack from my side fwiw. >> > >> > Thanks, I'll queue it up later today. >> >> btw should we add you as a (co)maintainer for driver/core/dma-buf since >> you seem to want to keep a closer tab on what the insane gfx folks are up >> to in there? > > Sure, why not, what's one more maintainership... > > Oh, does that mean you want me to be the one collecting the patches and > forwarding them on to Linus? If so, that's fine, I can easily do that > as well due to my infrastructure being set up for it. > If you're ok, I could continue to do the collecting / forwarding business - I guess Daniel meant more from the 'not miss patches that need review'! Upto you! > thanks, > > greg k-h Thanks and best regards, ~Sumit -- Thanks and regards, Sumit Semwal Graphics Engineer - Graphics working group Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
