Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/dsi: Add flag for continuous clock behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/04/2014 07:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Hi Andrejz,
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> On 07/02/2014 02:19 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>> As per section 5.6.1 of the DSI specification, all DSI transmitters must
>>> support continuous clock behavior on the clock lane, while non-continuous
>>> mode support is only optional. Add a flag that allows devices to indicate
>>> that they require continuous clock mode to operate properly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>>> index 944f33f..5913ef4 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>>> @@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ void mipi_dsi_host_unregister(struct mipi_dsi_host *host);
>>>  #define MIPI_DSI_MODE_VSYNC_FLUSH    BIT(8)
>>>  /* disable EoT packets in HS mode */
>>>  #define MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET     BIT(9)
>>> +/* use continuous clock behavior on the clock lane */
>>> +#define MIPI_DSI_MODE_CLOCK_CONTINUOUS       BIT(10)
>>>
>> According to MIPI DSI specification "All DSI transmitters and receivers
>> shall support continuous clock behavior on the Clock Lane, and
>> optionally may support non-continuous clock behavior". It suggests that
>> continuous clock should be default behavior. So maybe better is to
>> introduce sth like:
>> +#define MIPI_DSI_MODE_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS     BIT(10)
> I started under the assumption that current host drivers assumed
> non-continuous clock (as the Tegra driver currently does).

Exynos DSI driver uses continuous clock.
Currently, in mainline,  there are no more dsi hosts using drm_mipi_dsi.h.
As I stated before I prefer to follow dsi specification and it states
clearly that
continuous behavior is required, non-continouous is optional.
Moreover for tegra chip continuous behavior is also the default one.

Regards
Andrzej

>  In that
> light, it seemed to make sense (and to be less intrusive) to introduce
> that flag as a restriction rather than a capability. But if you think
> this should be a capability I am not strongly against it - either way,
> host drivers need to be changed to take that flag into account.
>

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux