2014-07-01 23:22 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 03:46:01PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:34:17PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> > Hi Russell,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Russell King
>> > <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > > +/*
>> > > + * Add a component to be matched.
>> > > + *
>> > > + * The match array is first created or extended if necessary.
>> > > + */
>> > > +void component_match_add(struct device *dev, struct component_match **matchptr,
>> > > + int (*compare)(struct device *, void *), void *compare_data)
>> > > +{
>> > > + struct component_match *match = *matchptr;
>> > > +
>> > > + if (IS_ERR(match))
>> > > + return;
>> > > +
>> > > + if (!match || match->num == match->alloc) {
>> > > + size_t new_size = match ? match->alloc + 16 : 15;
>> > > +
>> > > + match = component_match_realloc(dev, match, new_size);
>> > > +
>> > > + *matchptr = match;
>> > > +
>> > > + if (IS_ERR(match))
>> > > + return;
>> > > + }
>> > > +
>> > > + match->compare[match->num].fn = compare;
>> > > + match->compare[match->num].data = compare_data;
>> > > + match->num++;
>> > > +}
>> >
>> > component_match_add should be exported.
>>
>> Fixed, thanks.
>
> As there's no further comments, and Inki Dae has not responded, I'm
It's has been just a week. I will check and look into your patch
series. I think Exynos drm should also be considered for the use of
component match array.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> going to send these out without the RFC tag in the hope that people
> will provide acks. This allows us to move forward with this despite
> the Exynos DRM blockage.
>
> The ultimate plan is for patches 1 to 3 inclusive to be merged into
> Greg's driver tree, 1 to 3 and 5 into Greg's staging tree, and 1 to
> 3 and 4 for David Airlie's DRM tree - patches 1 to 3 are needed for
> both patches 4 and 5.
>
> --
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
> improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
