On 06/30/2014 03:18 PM, Christopher Friedt wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Christopher Friedt > <chrisfriedt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> That sounds a bit more accurate. Should kms and fbdev be setting both >> registers then? > I wonder if fbdev can use PITCHLOCK as well, rather than > BYTES_PER_LINE. I will only be able to run both kms and fbdev > functional tests about 9 hours from now, so any discussion until then > is welcome Please see the previous message I sent. If you just remove the line that sets BYTES_PER_LINE, fbdev will have called into the kms code to set PITCHLOCK correctly. /Thomas _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
