Hi Thierry, Thanks for looking at this. On 23 Jun 04:58 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:14:36PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > Given panels and I2C-connected encoders are required by DRM drivers, > > we need to change the link order so these are probed first. This commit > > moves all the i2c, panel and bridge helper drivers so they are probed > > before the DRM drivers. > > No. We don't need to change the link order. Could you clarify why? I guess you have some case in mind where changing the link order breaks things or makes something mis-behave. > What we need to do is make > sure that modules deal properly with situations where their resources > aren't available yet (i.e. EPROBE_DEFER). There are factors other than > link order that influence probe ordering. > While I understand defering is more robust, it would be systematically defering the probe when the DRM driver needs an I2C encoder. Just to name one example, the tilcdc, armada and others requiring TDA998x encoder will always defered the probe of the DRM, and then re-probe() once the encoder is ready. So, unless we have a good reason not to do this, it sounds a bit silly to me. -- Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
