On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 02:22:59PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > AFAICT, pstate file will contain something like >> > >> > 07: core 100 MHz memory 123 MHz * >> > 08: core 100-200 MHz memory 123 MHz >> > >> > ...which does not look exactly like one-value-per-file, and I'm pretty >> > sure userspace will get it wrong if it tries to parse it. Plus, I >> > don't see required documentation in Documentation/ABI. >> > >> > Should we disable it for now, so that userspace does not start >> > depending on it and we'll not have to maintain it forever? >> > >> > I guess better interface would be something like >> > >> > pstate/07/core_clock_min >> > core_clock_max >> > memory_clock_min >> > memory_clock_max >> > >> > and then pstate/active containing just the number of active state? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Pavel >> > >> > PS: I have no nvidia, got the news at >> > >> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=nouveau_try_linux316&num=2 >> >> FTR, this file has been in place since 3.13, and there was a different >> file before it (performance_levels), with a comparable format since >> much earlier (definitely 3.8, probably earlier). I think it's meant a >> lot more for people looking at it and echo'ing stuff to it to modify >> the levels (where supported), than for programs parsing it. Perhaps >> sysfs is the wrong place for this -- what is the right place? debugfs? > > Yes, please move it to debugfs. Could we just say that the format of this file is one-per-line of level: information-for-the-user And you can echo a level into it to switch to that level? That seems like a reasonable ABI to have... would be happy to throw it into a file somewhere... not sure where though. -ilia _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel