On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:32:29AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 07:03:39AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:46:40AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 08:26:55AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 10:30:15PM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > > > > With a tree that is close to 3.15 final I'm regularly seeing the > > > > > following on my EeePC 900 when starting ioquake3: > > > > > > > > > > [drm:intel_pipe_config_compare] *ERROR* mismatch in gmch_pfit.lvds_border_bits (expected 32768, found 0) > > > > > > > > Hm, I've thought we've fixed that by now. Alas, no :( > > > > > > > > Can you please add drm.debug=0xe to your kernel cmdline, reproduce the > > > > issue and attach the entire dmesg? Please make sure it contains everything > > > > since boot-up so that we can reconstruct the state properly (might need to > > > > grab it from logfiles if dmesg is cut off). > > > > > > Please find kern.log.gz attached. > > Not in the resend and I didn't seem to receive your original mail somehow > at all. Can you please resend. Downloadable from http://sucs.org/~sits/test/eeepc-900/dmesg-20140611 . By the way, Mutt seems to be becoming upset when I group reply to your mails. I think it's because your address is in both the To: and the Cc: fields.... > > > > Also, do you have any ideas when you reproduce this? Anything that changes > > > > the lvds output could be relevant ... > > > > > > Doing > > > xrandr -s 800x600 > > > xrandr -s 0 > > > > > > was enough to provoke the messages in the attached log. > > Ok, makes sense. Smells a bit like leftover pfit state. Can you please > also try latest drm-intel-nightly? The previous log is from drm-intel-nightly but there seem to be more warnings in it rather than less... -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/ _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
