Am 01.06.2014 01:10, schrieb Rickard Strandqvist:
There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.
This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On the one hand it looks like a valid fix to me, but on the other hand
the r600_cp.c code is deprecated for something like five years now.
I would like to avoid touching it in any way and just let it rest
peacefully until we can remove it entirely.
Christian.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c
index 8c9b7e2..0770ad6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c
@@ -2615,7 +2615,7 @@ int r600_cs_legacy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *fp
struct drm_radeon_cs *cs = data;
struct drm_buf *buf;
unsigned family;
- int l, r = 0;
+ int l = 0, r = 0;
u32 *ib, cs_id = 0;
if (dev_priv == NULL) {
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel