Re: [PATCH 2/8] drm: add signed-range property type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Like range, but values are signed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c  | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  include/drm/drm_crtc.h      | 12 ++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> index 61ddc66..88a0741 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> @@ -3242,6 +3242,22 @@ struct drm_property *drm_property_create_bitmask(struct drm_device *dev,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_property_create_bitmask);
>
> +static struct drm_property *property_create_range(struct drm_device *dev,
> +                                        int flags, const char *name,
> +                                        uint64_t min, uint64_t max)
> +{
> +       struct drm_property *property;
> +
> +       property = drm_property_create(dev, flags, name, 2);
> +       if (!property)
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       property->values[0] = min;
> +       property->values[1] = max;
> +
> +       return property;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * drm_property_create - create a new ranged property type
>   * @dev: drm device
> @@ -3264,21 +3280,20 @@ struct drm_property *drm_property_create_range(struct drm_device *dev, int flags
>                                          const char *name,
>                                          uint64_t min, uint64_t max)
>  {
> -       struct drm_property *property;
> -
> -       flags |= DRM_MODE_PROP_RANGE;
> -
> -       property = drm_property_create(dev, flags, name, 2);
> -       if (!property)
> -               return NULL;
> -
> -       property->values[0] = min;
> -       property->values[1] = max;
> -
> -       return property;
> +       return property_create_range(dev, DRM_MODE_PROP_RANGE | flags,
> +                       name, min, max);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_property_create_range);
>
> +struct drm_property *drm_property_create_signed_range(struct drm_device *dev,
> +                                        int flags, const char *name,
> +                                        int64_t min, int64_t max)
> +{
> +       return property_create_range(dev, DRM_MODE_PROP_SIGNED_RANGE | flags,
> +                       name, I642U64(min), I642U64(max));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_property_create_signed_range);
> +
>  struct drm_property *drm_property_create_object(struct drm_device *dev,
>                                          int flags, const char *name, uint32_t type)
>  {
> @@ -3718,6 +3733,12 @@ static bool drm_property_change_is_valid(struct drm_property *property,
>                 if (value < property->values[0] || value > property->values[1])
>                         return false;
>                 return true;
> +       } else if (drm_property_type_is(property, DRM_MODE_PROP_SIGNED_RANGE)) {
> +               int64_t svalue = U642I64(value);
> +               if (svalue < U642I64(property->values[0]) ||
> +                               svalue > U642I64(property->values[1]))
> +                       return false;
> +               return true;
>         } else if (drm_property_type_is(property, DRM_MODE_PROP_BITMASK)) {
>                 int i;
>                 uint64_t valid_mask = 0;
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> index c1c243f..9bd3551 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,15 @@ struct drm_object_properties {
>         uint64_t values[DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY];
>  };
>
> +static inline int64_t U642I64(uint64_t val)
> +{
> +       return (int64_t)*((int64_t *)&val);

The cast to "(int64_t)" is unneeded. Dereferencing (int64_t*) will
always yield (int64_t).

Same below.

Btw., why are these macros needed? unsigned->signed conversion is
well-defined. signed->unsigned is undefined, but I thought we rely on
static reinterpretation in the kernel. Dunno.. maybe I'm wrong.

Anyhow, this is:

Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
David

> +}
> +static inline uint64_t I642U64(int64_t val)
> +{
> +       return (uint64_t)*((uint64_t *)&val);
> +}
> +
>  enum drm_connector_force {
>         DRM_FORCE_UNSPECIFIED,
>         DRM_FORCE_OFF,
> @@ -982,6 +991,9 @@ struct drm_property *drm_property_create_bitmask(struct drm_device *dev,
>  struct drm_property *drm_property_create_range(struct drm_device *dev, int flags,
>                                          const char *name,
>                                          uint64_t min, uint64_t max);
> +struct drm_property *drm_property_create_signed_range(struct drm_device *dev,
> +                                        int flags, const char *name,
> +                                        int64_t min, int64_t max);
>  struct drm_property *drm_property_create_object(struct drm_device *dev,
>                                          int flags, const char *name, uint32_t type);
>  extern void drm_property_destroy(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_property *property);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h
> index 5b530c7..ded505e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h
> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ struct drm_mode_get_connector {
>  #define DRM_MODE_PROP_EXTENDED_TYPE    0x0000ffc0
>  #define DRM_MODE_PROP_TYPE(n)          ((n) << 6)
>  #define DRM_MODE_PROP_OBJECT           DRM_MODE_PROP_TYPE(1)
> +#define DRM_MODE_PROP_SIGNED_RANGE     DRM_MODE_PROP_TYPE(2)
>
>  struct drm_mode_property_enum {
>         __u64 value;
> --
> 1.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux