On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:06:28PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [snip] > >> Well, there was the NONBLOCK atomic flag.. I'm not entirely sure if we >> should hang so much off of that one flag. > > Yeah, a separate VBLANK_SYNCED might be useful. Apparently people also > want non-blocking modesets. random-diverging-from-original-topic-thought.. seems like userspace just wants a deadline/timeout (hopefully in units of vblanks).. at least to the level of "I want this to happen on the next vblank (after rendering completes), or give me an error" vs "I want this to complete atomically even if it takes a few extra vblanks for things to sort out".. I guess that amounts to what you mean by VBLANK_SYNCED flag, but VBLANKED_SYNCED might not be a good name.. at least for some hw all you can do is vblank sync'd.. BR, -R _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
