Hi On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Ross Zwisler wrote: >> With this commit: >> >> 2a0788dc9bc4 x86: Use clflushopt in drm_clflush_virt_range >> >> If clflushopt is available on the system, we use it instead of clflush >> in drm_clflush_virt_range. There were two calls to clflush in this >> function, but only one was changed to clflushopt. This patch changes >> the other clflush call to clflushopt. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c >> index 534cb89..041b73b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c >> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ drm_clflush_virt_range(char *addr, unsigned long length) >> char *end = addr + length; >> mb(); >> for (; addr < end; addr += boot_cpu_data.x86_clflush_size) >> - clflush(addr); >> + clflushopt(addr); >> clflushopt(end - 1); >> mb(); >> return; >> -- >> 1.7.10.4 > > Ping? :) This was merged through -tip, right? The DRM tree does not include the initial patches, yet, so I'd recommend merging this through -tip again. I've put hpa on CC for that. However, I cannot see where the initial patch was sent to, so can you resent it properly to lkml, please? And please also put the respective maintainers on CC. Thanks David _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
