On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:48:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:09:32PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add a helper function that allows drivers to statically set the unique > > name of the device. This will allow platform and USB drivers to get rid > > of their DRM bus implementations and directly use drm_dev_alloc() and > > drm_dev_register(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c | 1 + > > include/drm/drmP.h | 3 +++ > > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c > > index 2dd3a6d8382b..371db3bef60c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c > > @@ -42,6 +42,20 @@ > > #include <asm/mtrr.h> > > #endif > > > > +int drm_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *fmt, ...) > > Can you please add a bit of kerneldoc for this? drm_ioctl.c isn't yet > pulled into the drm reference docbook, but better to have it there > already. On second thought, wouldn't this be better located in drm_stub.c? It isn't really related to the IOCTL code except that one of the IOCTLs now uses the information set by this function. Logically I think it belongs with the likes of drm_dev_alloc() and drm_dev_register(). Thierry
Attachment:
pgpNLhHmdDU7h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
