Hi Christian, Alex,
While looking over the rest of the ring counts
I noticed an other one, this time we reserve too
much which cannot even be a potential problem.
Anyway, it's nicer to be correct.
Attached that patch to uvd_v1_0_ring_test()
Greetings
Mathias
>From 889f02196e1a3a571aac8e878574e48a7469cb42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Mathias=20Fr=C3=B6hlich?= <Mathias.Froehlich@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:37:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: fix count in uvd_v1_0_ring_test()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Should be 2 rather than 3.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Fröhlich <Mathias.Froehlich@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/uvd_v1_0.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/uvd_v1_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/uvd_v1_0.c
index 0a243f0..d50f510 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/uvd_v1_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/uvd_v1_0.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ int uvd_v1_0_ring_test(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_ring *ring)
int r;
WREG32(UVD_CONTEXT_ID, 0xCAFEDEAD);
- r = radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 3);
+ r = radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 2);
if (r) {
DRM_ERROR("radeon: cp failed to lock ring %d (%d).\n",
ring->idx, r);
--
1.9.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel