On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > Separation of the interfaces exposed by the device from the device itself > seems to me a good thing. I would even consider it as a biggest > advantage of this solution :) > > The problem of re-initialization does not seems to be relevant here, it > is classic > problem of coding correctness nothing more, it can appear here and in > many different > places. It may be a problem of coding correctless, but it's also a maintainability problem too - it makes it _much_ more difficult to ensure that everything is correct. > Anyway it seems we have different point of view on the problem, your say > about devices with two stage initialization. I see it more as devices > registering interfaces and superdevice using it. Right, so please make this exynos-specific, because from what I can see it has no reason to pretend to be generic. As I've already pointed out, it can't be used in the general case because it ties sub-components directly to their main driver, which is absolutely absurd. Please keep this absurdness in exynos and don't spread it around. Thanks. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
