Hi, On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independent > of SoC, something like "samsung,exynos-simple-phy" and provide Reg > and Bit through phy provider node. This way we can avoid SoC specific > hardcoding in phy driver and don't need to look into dt bindings for > each new SoC. I believe it is a not recommended approach. > We can use syscon interface to access PMU bits like USB phy. > PMU is already registered as system controller Yes, that sounds good. This way we could avoid overlapping memory mapped register regions specified in 'reg' properties in the device tree. -- Thanks, Sylwester _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
