Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/mm: Don't WARN if drm_mm_reserve_node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:21:44AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> I am not convinced this is the correct solution. At least the way we
> used this interface, it isn't meant to ever fail.  I also didn't look
> into exactly why we depend an ENOSPC return. That sounds fragile to me,
> especially for a public interface.

Eh? This interface is explicitly used to check that the requested range
is available.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux