On 04/05/2014 02:44 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > ttm_bo_unref unconditionally calls kref_put on it's argument, so the > thing can't be NULL without already causing Oopses. Doesn't this mean the NULL check is in the wrong place (rather than the NULL check should be removed)? > Spotted by coverity. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c > index 26868e5c55b0..0722d18992f4 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c > @@ -322,9 +322,7 @@ static void mgag200_bo_unref(struct mgag200_bo **bo) > > tbo = &((*bo)->bo); > ttm_bo_unref(&tbo); > - if (tbo == NULL) > - *bo = NULL; > - > + *bo = NULL; > } > > void mgag200_gem_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj) > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
