Re: [PATCH] drm: Add support for two-ended allocation, v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:00:00 +0200
Christian König <deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Nice idea, but I wouldn't put the decision where to place the buffer 
> into TTM based on it's size.
> 
> Instead please make that a proper TTM placement flag because for example 
> for VM page tables we want them to be at the end of VRAM, not because 
> they are big (which they are anyway) but because they never accessed by 
> the CPU.

I think there aren't many special cases like that, and they could
already be handled by setting the first and last pages for the bo?

- Lauri
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux