Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: drop __FUNCTION__ as argument to DRM_DEBUG_KMS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 28 Mar 2014, Christoph Jaeger <christophjaeger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS includes printing the function name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Jaeger <christophjaeger@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c
> index 954acb2..ce5242f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c
> @@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static enum drm_mode_status ns2501_mode_valid(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>  					      struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>  {
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS
> -	    ("%s: is mode valid (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d)\n",
> -	     __FUNCTION__, mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay,
> -	     mode->vtotal);
> +	    ("is mode valid (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d)\n",
> +	     mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay, mode->vtotal);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Currently, these are all the modes I have data from.
> @@ -261,9 +260,8 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>  	struct ns2501_priv *ns = (struct ns2501_priv *)(dvo->dev_priv);
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS
> -	    ("%s: set mode (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d).\n",
> -	     __FUNCTION__, mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay,
> -	     mode->vtotal);
> +	    ("set mode (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d).\n",
> +	     mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay, mode->vtotal);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Where do I find the native resolution for which scaling is not required???
> @@ -277,8 +275,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>  		if (mode->hdisplay == 800 && mode->vdisplay == 600) {
>  			/* mode 277 */
>  			ns->reg_8_shadow &= ~NS2501_8_BPAS;
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 800x600\n",
> -				      __FUNCTION__);
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 800x600\n");
>  
>  			/*
>  			 * No, I do not know where this data comes from.
> @@ -341,8 +338,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>  
>  		} else if (mode->hdisplay == 640 && mode->vdisplay == 480) {
>  			/* mode 274 */
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 640x480\n",
> -				      __FUNCTION__);
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 640x480\n");
>  			/*
>  			 * No, I do not know where this data comes from.
>  			 * It is just what the video bios left in the DVO, so
> @@ -406,8 +402,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>  
>  		} else if (mode->hdisplay == 1024 && mode->vdisplay == 768) {
>  			/* mode 280 */
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 1024x768\n",
> -				      __FUNCTION__);
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 1024x768\n");
>  			/*
>  			 * This might or might not work, actually. I'm silently
>  			 * assuming here that the native panel resolution is
> @@ -458,8 +453,7 @@ static void ns2501_dpms(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo, bool enable)
>  	struct ns2501_priv *ns = (struct ns2501_priv *)(dvo->dev_priv);
>  	unsigned char ch;
>  
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: Trying set the dpms of the DVO to %i\n",
> -		      __FUNCTION__, enable);
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Trying set the dpms of the DVO to %i\n", enable);
>  
>  	ch = ns->reg_8_shadow;
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.5.3
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux