On 17/03/14 16:22, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> +Example
>> +-------
>> +
>> +lcd0: display {
>> + compatible = "tpo,taal", "panel-dsi-cm";
>> + label = "lcd0";
>> +
>> + gpios = <&gpio4 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* 102, reset */
>
> If the panel uses a TE GPIO but no reset GPIO, do you plan to express this
> with a "hole" for the reset GPIO ? e.g. something like
>
> gpios = <0>, <&gpio4 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
Yes.
> Wouldn't it be better to split the gpios property into "reset-gpios" and "te-
> gpios" ?
Yes, I can change it. I don't have a strong preference.
I've gotten similar comments for other bindings also, so I guess the
preferred way is to use named "-gpios" properties for everything except
the case where you really have multiple gpios with the same purpose?
The gpio binding documentation doesn't give much guidance on this.
Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
