Hi Grant, Ping. Are you fine with me proceeding with the current V4L2 port/endpoint bindings? Tomi On 12/03/14 10:15, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On 28/02/14 14:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This series is a re-send of >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/61739 >> >> I'm cc'ing more people, and I want to clarify the contents of the series: >> >> While this has been developed for OMAP, only the first patch is about OMAP >> bindings. The rest are generic bindings for video components, which can be used >> on any platform. >> >> The bindings use the V4L2 style video port/endpoint system, described in >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt, to connect the >> components. The same port/endpoint bindings are used by Philipp Zabel in his >> imx-drm patch series. > > This series is a piece of bigger series, which brings DT support for > OMAP display subsystem. This uses the same V4L2 style ports/endpoints as > has been discussed recently regarding the series from Philipp. It > doesn't use the helper code from Philipp, but a custom one as Philipp's > code didn't exist when I made this, and also because I needed extra > functionality not present in Philipp's series (which aimed to just move > the current V4L2 code to a common place). > > The main concerns with the ports/endpoints has been the optional 'port' > node for the case where we have a single endpoint, and the > double-linking of the endpoints. > > If I remove the optional 'port' usage from my series, are you ok with me > proceeding with this series for 3.15, with the double-linked endpoints? > > As far as I see, when we come to a conclusion how the linking should be > made, it's trivial to change the bindings in this series to match it, > even without needing any compatibility code. I just need to remove the > other link, and old dts files having double-linking will still work fine. > > The reason I want to push this forward asap is that omap4 and omap5 are > already DT only, and for omap5 we don't have working display without DT > support for display. For omap4, we have a really hacky way to add > display support for a few boards, but that is causing major headaches > and I want to get rid of it. > > Tomi > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
