On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The gma500 driver sets DRIVER_GEM unconditionally, so testing for the > absence of the feature will always fail. > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> Queued for -next Thanks Patrik > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/gem.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/gem.c > index d8426bc31b09..424dda95fbc6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/gem.c > @@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ int psb_gem_dumb_map_gtt(struct drm_file *file, struct drm_device *dev, > int ret = 0; > struct drm_gem_object *obj; > > - if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM)) > - return -ENODEV; > - > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > > /* GEM does all our handle to object mapping */ > -- > 1.8.4.2 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel