On 07/03/14 15:05, David Herrmann wrote: > If you can take these two patches, that's fine. They're not strictly > needed by the series and I'd be happy to see them upstream. The other > sysfb patches should be merged together, so I don't think there's much > gain in applying them through fbdev. Ok, I've applied them to fbdev tree. > The DRM tree is usually merged late, anyway, so I'll see whether we > will merge simpledrm through drm-next or not. If not, it'll be 3.16 > then. If you can get the fbdev merge in early, that should be enough > for us to figure it out and provide a conflict-resolution. Btw., do > you want the generic sysfb-helper in drivers/video/ or > driver/video/fbdev? It's not limited to fbdev, so I'd put it in > drivers/video/. With a quick glance, it doesn't seem to depend on fbdev in any way, right? That makes me think drivers/video/. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
