op 19-02-14 14:56, Thomas Hellstrom schreef:
>+static void fence_check_cb_func(struct fence *f, struct fence_cb *cb) >+{ >+ struct sync_fence_cb *check = container_of(cb, struct sync_fence_cb, cb); >+ struct sync_fence *fence = check->fence; >+ >+ // TODO: Add a fence->status member and check itHmm, C++ / C99 style comments makes checkpatch.pl complain. Did you run this series through checkpatch? /Thomas
Actually I used c99 here because it shouldn't have been in the sent patch. ;-) Right below that comment I use fence->status, so the right thing to do was to zap the comment. Thanks for catching it! ~Maarten\ _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
