On 2014/2/19 18:12, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > op 19-02-14 05:53, Jiang Liu schreef: >> On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0) >> has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different >> from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation >> to check availability of _DSM functions instead of using common >> acpi_check_dsm() interface. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Hi Maarten, >> Thanks for bisecting. Could you please help to verify whether >> this patch fixes the regression? >> > Tested-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I was wrong about the operator precedence, seems correct after all. :-) Hi Maarten, Thanks for testing. Cheers! Gerry _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
