On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 07:45:36PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > +static void tda_get_encoder(struct tda_priv *priv) > +{ > + struct snd_soc_codec *codec = priv->codec; > + struct device_node *np; > + struct i2c_client *i2c_client; > + static const struct of_device_id tda_dt[] = { > + { .compatible = "nxp,tda998x" }, > + { }, > + }; > + > + /* search the tda998x device */ > + np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, tda_dt, NULL); > + if (!np || !of_device_is_available(np)) { > + dev_err(codec->dev, "No tda998x in DT\n"); > + return; > + } > + i2c_client = of_find_i2c_device_by_node(np); Like I said last time I'd really expect this to look like a MFD (or generally a proper CODEC driver) so we don't get this weird probe ordering stuff. If you don't think that's sensible for some reason it'd be helpful to understand why.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel