On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:57:45AM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@xxxxxxx> This lacks a description detailing why this change is necessary. While I can see the sense in preventing a subsequent write succeeding after a failed page register write, we still continue blindly on accessing the device after a read or write fails. For istance, how many calls to reg_write() or reg_read() are checked for failure? That said, the patch does not appear to create any detrimental effects, so it gets a tested-by but *no* acked-by. Please give it a better description justifying this change for an acked-by. Tested-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad. Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit". _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
