Building ramnve0.o triggers a GCC warning on 32 bits x86:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c: In function 'nve0_ram_ctor':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c:1253:1: warning: the frame size of 1496 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
This warning is caused by ramfuc_reg(), which is inlined 74 times in
nve0_ram_ctor(). Mark it noinline to silence this warning.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Compile tested (on 32 bits x86) only. I've no Nvidia cards at hand, so I
can't really test it.
This assumes this function - a constructor, apparently - isn't called
often, so the overhead calling of 74 functions is acceptable. (The same
goes for the similar functions in [...]/ramnva3.c and in
[...]/ramnvc0.c, though these call ramfuc_reg() not quite as often.)
Perhaps there are other downsides to not inlining this function too. So
proper testing will probably be needed.
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h
index 0f57fcf..04e3849 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ ramfuc_reg2(u32 addr1, u32 addr2)
};
}
-static inline struct ramfuc_reg
+static noinline struct ramfuc_reg
ramfuc_reg(u32 addr)
{
return ramfuc_reg2(addr, addr);
--
1.8.4.2
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
