On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 06:00:12PM -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Treat both negative and zero return values from clk_round_rate() as > errors. This is needed since subsequent patches will convert > clk_round_rate()'s return value to be an unsigned type, rather than a > signed type, since some clock sources can generate rates higher than > (2^31)-1 Hz. > > Eventually, when calling clk_round_rate(), only a return value of zero > will be considered a error. All other values will be considered valid > rates. The comparison against values less than 0 is kept to preserve > the correct behavior in the meantime. Shouldn't it be an error when the result is not within sensible limits instead? What do you do with a rate of 1Hz? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
