On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:00:13AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: [...] > More like code written in the same style as x86 DRM stuff, where > they're not used to overabstracting things from day one to make things > generic instead of supporting the only known chip combination to date. [...] > On the other hand, there's a chance more abstraction than that is > needed when the second or third chip is added. Until then, there's > little point in doing premature work on abstracting too much of it > out. I'd rather see the code go in sooner and iterate in the tree. +1 Thierry
Attachment:
pgpyLYNHn1fdj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
