Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'd prefer to see sbc stay with its current name, since that's its name > in the specs we're trying to implement (GLX_OML_sync_control, > GLX_INTEL_swap_event). If you drop the rename from the patch, > > Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> Sounds good. > I read that as "SBC is incremented when the PresentComplete comes in" > not "SBC is incremented when we generate the Present request". > Otherwise glXWaitForSbcOML doesn't make much sense. (in the "e.g." I'm > assuming they're talking a hardware register for pageflipping that > immediately starts scanning out the new stuff, not our fancy new > automatically double buffered ones that you have to push hard on to get > an immediate pageflip mode) Oh, that's almost sensible. And nicely eliminates the silly sleep(1) loop. New patches coming shortly. -- keith.packard@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpfktmof95ry.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
