On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:57:23AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:12:13PM -0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > > I don't know what else you'd propose? Pass an X visual in the ioctl? > > An EGL config? This is our name space, we can add stuff as we need > > (as Keith is doing here). include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h is the > > canonical source for these values and we should add > > DRM_FORMAT_SARGB8888 there to make sure we don't clash. > > Well that's kinda the problem. If you don't expect the kernel to clash > with whatever mesa is using internally then we should add it to the > kernel, first. That's kinda what Dave's recent rant has all been about. > > The other issue was that originally the idea behind fourcc was to have one > formate namespace shared between drm, v4l and whomever else cares. If > people are happy to drop that idea on the floor I won't shed a single > tear. I broke that idea alredy when I cooked up the current drm fourccs. I didn't cross check them with any other fourcc source, so I'm 100% sure most of them don't match anything else. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
