Re: [PATCH] drm/doc: Document KUnit expectations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/doc: Document KUnit expectations
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:34:18 +0100
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250113101100.1373856-1-mripard@kernel.org>
References: <20250113101100.1373856-1-mripard@kernel.org>

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:11:00 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The DRM and KMS frameworks and helpers gain more and more kunit
> coverage, so let's document what our expectations are.
> 
> 

Applied to misc/kernel.git (drm-misc-next).

Thanks!
Maxime

References:
- [PATCH] drm/doc: Document KUnit expectations
  - From: Maxime Ripard

Prev by Date: [PATCH RFC] backlight: pwm_bl: Read back PWM period from provider
Next by Date: [PATCH v2] drm/imagination: avoid deadlock on fence release
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] drm/doc: Document KUnit expectations
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 8/8] mm: Remove PG_reclaim
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DRI Users] [Linux Intel Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux