On Wed, Feb 26, 2025, at 09:16, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 26.02.25 um 08:55 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> Here's another general question. vgacon and fbcon only seem usable with
> CONFIG_VT=y. Wouldn't it make sense to have them depend on CONFIG_VT=y?
> dummycon could then be implemented as part of the vt code, maybe even
> become a vt-internal thing. The console code is complex, so I'm probably
> missing something here?
I think in theory one may have a system use fbcon purely to get the
boot logo, but not actually support VT. I had also assumed there might
be a way to use fbcon as the console (i.e. printk) but not register
the tty, but it looks like the console code still requires vt.
After I looked at the vt and conswitchp code some more, I wonder
if we could go the other way and instead of integrating it more
make the conswitchp logic optional: most of the complexity here
deals with switching between text console and fbcon dynamically,
but having any text console support is getting very rare (vga
on alpha/mips/x86-32, newport on mips-ip22, sti on parisc).
If we do this, the conswitchp code could be merged with dummycon
in drivers/video/console, with the simpler alternative just
calling into fbcon functions. I'm not sure if we can already drop
vgacon from normal x86-64 distro configs, i.e. if there are cases
that are not already covered by any of efi-earlycon, efifb,
vga16fb, vesafb/uvesafb or a PCI DRM driver.
Arnd
