On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:14:39AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Thierry Reding > <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 02:31:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> I'm a bit confused about how this all works wrt host1x clients, but > >> this patch looks like the right thing to me. > >> > >> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/host1x/drm/drm.c | 3 +-- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > This has been largely rewritten in the code that I submitted in my 3.13 > > pull request. In fact Tegra DRM no longer uses drm_platform, but a > > custom bus type to deal with the quirkiness of the multi-driver > > architecture. > > > > So if you really want to get rid of drm_bus altogether I'd appreciate a > > heads-up so I know what's coming and can prepare. > > It's almost completely gone now, the one thing left to do is rip out > bus->set_busid. But I have that planned already. > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm/log/?h=drm-init-cleanup > > I guess I get to rebase the entire thing again, meh. > > <rant> > It'd be awesome of other drm drivers would submit their stuff a bit > earlier, atm there's absolutely nothing in drm-next beside all of > intel and a few things for armada... Maybe we need to have a drm > integration tree to make this a bit less frustrating. > </rant> Yeah, I know. I had actually planned on sending out this pull request much earlier, but then all the discussion around DRM panel and device tree bindings started again... Thierry
Attachment:
pgpPKnp43NLl4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
