On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:35:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote: > >>From: Rob Pearce <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as > >>having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to > >>the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4 > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>--- > >>Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS. > >>According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't. > > > >Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well? > > > > Hi Greg, > > pardon my ignorance, but I thought this was supposed to be the maintainer's call to make ? > Did I get this wrong ? Maintainer occasionally fumble it, so it's better when the patch submitter also thinks about this. I can always change it when I disagree ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
