> As I mentioned earlier, display_ops is needed to have no any > dependency of drm framework directly like below, > > DRM Framework > | > Exynos DRM Framework > / | \ > Real device drivers > > In particular, in case of ARM based DRM drivers with separated > devices, I still tend to think it's better design than that device > drivers implement the connector callbacks directly, but I will try to > consider what is the better way. > I think we need to start considering a framework where subdrivers just add drm objects themselves, then the toplevel node is responsible for knowing that everything for the current configuration is loaded. I realise we may need to make changes to the core drm to allow this but we should probably start to create a strategy for fixing the API issues that this throws up. Note I'm not yet advocating for dynamic addition of nodes once the device is in use, or removing them. Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
