Hi Dmitry,
On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 16:57:38 +0200
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 11:40:02AM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > Instead of using dsi->out_bridge during the bridge search process, use a
> > temporary variable and assign dsi->out_bridge only on successful
> > completion.
> >
> > The main goal is to be able to drm_bridge_get() the out_bridge before
> > setting it in dsi->out_bridge, which is done in a later commit. Setting
> > dsi->out_bridge as in current code would leave a use-after-free window in
> > case the bridge is deallocated by some other thread between
> > 'dsi->out_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add()' and drm_bridge_get().
>
> I don't think that's how refcounting should work. Any of the functions
> that give you the bridge should also increase refcount, requiring manual
> _put() call afterwards. We might need a separate API for that.
You're perfectly right.
> > This change additionally avoids leaving an ERR_PTR value in dsi->out_bridge
> > on failure. This is not necessarily a problem but it is not clean.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > This patch was added in v5.
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 15 +++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> > index f8b4fb8357659018ec0db65374ee5d05330639ae..c4d1563fd32019efde523dfc0863be044c05a826 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> > @@ -1705,6 +1705,7 @@ static int samsung_dsim_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
> > struct device *dev = dsi->dev;
> > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > struct device_node *remote;
> > + struct drm_bridge *out_bridge;
> > struct drm_panel *panel;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -1740,21 +1741,23 @@ static int samsung_dsim_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
> >
> > panel = of_drm_find_panel(remote);
> > if (!IS_ERR(panel)) {
> > - dsi->out_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dev, panel);
> > + out_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dev, panel);
> > } else {
> > - dsi->out_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote);
> > - if (!dsi->out_bridge)
> > - dsi->out_bridge = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > + out_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote);
> > + if (!out_bridge)
> > + out_bridge = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > }
>
> While looking at this patch, I think we should migrate the driver to
> drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge().
Indeed, the code here is duplicating drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(). I'm
going to convert it.
> Then your patch might add a function
> close to devm_drm_of_get_bridge() or drmm_of_get_bridge().
...which would return a bridge pointer, with refcount already
incremented. Sure, except I think it should _not_ be a drmm, as
the bridge might itself disappear while the card keeps existing.
Luca
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
