On 11/10/24 - 10:53, Maira Canal wrote: > Hi Louis, > > On 10/11/24 06:36, Louis Chauvet wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Until this point, this series has not received any major comments since > > v9. I will commit patches 1-9 next week if there are no further comments. > > > > Although we are maintainers of VKMS, it isn't recommended that we push > our own changes without even the Ack of another person. Please, read the > "drm-misc Committer Guidelines" [1]. Hi Maíra, Maxime, I apologize for this rushed commit request. I sent the initial email with a delay before the commit action because I was not sure about the procedure and wanted to give others a chance to raise any concerns. Unfortunately, I overlooked the need to collect an Ack/Review for each patch, even when there hadn't been any responses for several months. I'm sorry for this oversight. > I can ack patches 05/15, 07/15, and 09/15, but it would be more > beneficial for the community if you ask for an ack (from me or from the > DRM maintainers, which are always around), instead of saying that you > are going to commit the patches without any review. I will be happy to ask for acknowledgments if needed, but as you mentioned multiple times: nobody is paid to maintain VKMS. Since you did not comment these series since July, when you told me you would review my patches, I assumed it was either okay or you no longer had the time to maintain (which I completely understand). So, I hereby formally request reviews/ACKs for the following series: [this series]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241007-yuv-v12-0-01c1ada6fec8@xxxxxxxxxxx/ [2]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241007-b4-new-color-formats-v2-0-d47da50d4674@xxxxxxxxxxx/ [3]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240516-writeback_line_by_line-v1-0-7b2e3bf9f1c9@xxxxxxxxxxx/ (I have to send a v2 for [3] because of rebase conflict, but nothing else changed) Thanks a lot, Louis Chauvet > [1] https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/maintainer-tools/committer/committer-drm-misc.html > > Best Regards, > - Maíra > > > For patches 10-15, I am currently waiting for feedback from Maxime to > > send the next iteration with a fix for kunit tests. > > > > Thanks, > > Louis Chauvet > > > > On 07/10/24 - 18:10, Louis Chauvet wrote: > > > As all the rotation are now supported by VKMS, this simplification does > > > not make sense anymore, so remove it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c | 7 +------ > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c > > > index 8875bed76410..5a028ee96c91 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c > > > @@ -115,12 +115,7 @@ static void vkms_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane, > > > frame_info->fb = fb; > > > memcpy(&frame_info->map, &shadow_plane_state->data, sizeof(frame_info->map)); > > > drm_framebuffer_get(frame_info->fb); > > > - frame_info->rotation = drm_rotation_simplify(new_state->rotation, DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 | > > > - DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90 | > > > - DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270 | > > > - DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X | > > > - DRM_MODE_REFLECT_Y); > > > - > > > + frame_info->rotation = new_state->rotation; > > > vkms_plane_state->pixel_read_line = get_pixel_read_line_function(fmt); > > > } > > > > > > -- > > > 2.46.2 > > >
