On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:09:22PM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:40:08 +0100 > Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > This patch adds ARGB hardware cursor support to the DRM driver for the > > > > Marvell Armada SoCs. ARGB cursors are supported at either 32x64 or > > > > 64x32 resolutions. > > > [snip] > > > > > > I don't see the interest of such cursors. Actually, most often, the > > > cursors are 64x64 and 'A' is either 0 or 0xff. As the Armada 510 > > > supports 64x64 cursors with transparency, it would be more useful to > > > implement these ones... > > > > Sorry, you're completely wrong there. Xorg uses an alphablended cursor. > > This patch is a result of trialling each of the Armada's cursor options > > and this is the only one which results in a reasonable looking cursor. > > Strange. I am using the 64x64 cursor with transparency of the 510 for > many months and I never saw any problem. When I tried it, all cursors had variable alpha, and converting the alpha to a single transparency bit made the cursor look rubbish against certain backgrounds. > If you absolutely want to have all transparency shades, you should > accept 64x64 cursors and test if they may be rendered as 64x32 or > 32x64, i.e. test that there is only pure transparency in the non- > rendered rectangles... That is policy, and that is something which can be done by the X server rather than the kernel. The kernel exposes the hardware capabilities, which are to allow a 64x32 or a 32x64 cursor. Userspace can make the decision dynamically which it wishes to use. However, what you're suggesting is dangerous. What do you do when you're presented with a cursor which is 64x64 ? Do you: (a) not display it (b) crash the X server There isn't a fallback to using software cursors available in the X server because there's no error reporting for a failed hardware cursor update. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel