Hi! > > 1. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/6b32fb73-0544-4a68-95ba-e82406a4b188@xxxxxx/ > > -> Should be no problem? Because this is not generally exposing wmi > > calls, just mapping two explicitly with sanitized input (whitelisting > > basically). > > It would be OK to expose a selected set of WMI calls to userspace and sanitizing the input of protect potentially buggy firmware from userspace. > I don't believe this is good idea. Passthrough interfaces where userland talks directly to hardware are very tricky. > > Regarding the basic idea of having a virtual HID interface: i would prefer to create a illumination subsystem instead, but i have to agree that we should be doing this > only after enough drivers are inside the kernel, so we can design a > suitable interface for them. For now, creating a virtual HID > interface seems to be good enough. I have an RGB keyboard, and would like to get it supported. I already have kernel driver for LEDs (which breaks input functionality). I'd like to cooperate on "illumination" subsystem. Best regards, Pavel -- People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
