Re: [PATCH] drm: Try loading builtin EDIDs first

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:22:07PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > +static bool edid_check_size(const u8 *data, int data_size)
> > +{
> > +	if (data[0x7e] > 0x7e)
> > +		return false;
> 
> That should be 'if (data_size <= 0x7e) return false;' no?
> 
> Or maybe just 'data_size < EDID_LENGTH' since we anyway want a
> multiple of EDID_LENGTH.

Hmm, I'm missing the point here then. If edid_size() only returns a
non-zero mulitple of EDID_LENGTH, data_size must also be a non-zero
multiple of EDID_LENGTH for it to pass.

If you want to simply give me your ideal check_size()... :)
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux